Vergleich: Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 22x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.18

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Hankook ION Evo 2025

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

3. Falken e.Ziex 87%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

89%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 96%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Hankook ION Evo 69%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 77%

2. Falken e.Ziex 60%

3. Hankook ION Evo 60%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Hankook ION Evo A

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?