Vergleich: Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Barum Polaris 6

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Barum Polaris 6 Budget-Reifen

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

4. Barum Polaris 6 78

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

3. Barum Polaris 6 3x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Barum Polaris 6 2.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. Barum Polaris 6 10.

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Barum Polaris 6 7

1. Barum Polaris 6 2025

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Sehr gut

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Sehr gut

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

4. Barum Polaris 6 Gut

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Gut

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Gut

4. Barum Polaris 6 Gut

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Barum
Polaris 6

80.8%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

3. Barum Polaris 6 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Barum Polaris 6 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

Barum
Polaris 6

83.2%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80.6%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Barum Polaris 6 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

3. Barum Polaris 6 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. Barum Polaris 6 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

79.2%

Barum
Polaris 6

77.5%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

4. Barum Polaris 6 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

4. Barum Polaris 6 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

4. Barum Polaris 6 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

4. Barum Polaris 6 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

4. Barum Polaris 6 C

Barum
Polaris 6

81.3%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Barum Polaris 6 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Barum Polaris 6 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Barum
Polaris 6

88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 60%

3. Barum Polaris 6 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Barum Polaris 6 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Barum
Polaris 6

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%