Vergleich: Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

54%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 63%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 74%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 90%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

4. Falken e.Ziex 73%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

80%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

63%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

44%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 88%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?