Vergleich: Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Falken
e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75.8%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

54%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 76%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

3. Falken e.Ziex 55%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 71%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 76%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

3. Falken e.Ziex 55%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

93%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

80%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

74.8%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 100%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 63%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 58%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 79%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75.5%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

40%

1. Falken e.Ziex 67%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 34%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 45%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

91.3%

Falken
e.Ziex

89%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

60%

1. Falken e.Ziex 89%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 60%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?