Vergleich: Continental SportContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Continental SportContact 7 Premium

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premium

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental SportContact 7 122

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 58

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental SportContact 7 15x

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 5x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 1.

2. Continental SportContact 7 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Continental SportContact 7 2.

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 4.

3. Falken e.Ziex 5.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

1. Continental SportContact 7 1.2

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2.2

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

1. Continental SportContact 7 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2025

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Continental SportContact 7 überragend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental SportContact 7 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

Continental
SportContact 7

82%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Continental SportContact 7 95%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 85%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Continental SportContact 7 85%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Continental SportContact 7 89%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 86%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Continental SportContact 7 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Continental SportContact 7 86%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Continental SportContact 7 A

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Continental
SportContact 7

90%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Continental SportContact 7 94%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Continental SportContact 7 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Continental SportContact 7 86%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Continental SportContact 7 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Continental
SportContact 7

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 90%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Continental SportContact 7 75%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

3. Continental SportContact 7 70%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

3. Continental SportContact 7 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

Continental
SportContact 7

79%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Continental SportContact 7 79%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV B

3. Continental SportContact 7 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?