58 Läden, 184 262 Produkte

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 P gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Inhaltsverzeichnis:

Zusammenfassung
Nass
Trocken
Schnee
Eis
Kosten
Gegenseitige Prüfungen
Kaufen %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ /87%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Abmessungen	R14 - R21	R14 - R22	R16 - R22	R14 - R18	R0 - R21	R14 - R19
Preis	Dimension einstellen, um Preise zu sehen	Dimension einstellen, um Preise zu sehen	Dimension einstellen, um Preise zu sehen	Dimension einstellen, um Preise zu sehen	Dimension einstellen, um Preise zu sehen	Dimension einstellen, um Preise zu sehen
Entfernen	Aus dem Vergleich entfernen	Aus dem Vergleich entfernen	Aus dem Vergleich entfernen	Aus dem Vergleich entfernen	Aus dem Vergleich entfernen	Aus dem Vergleich entfernen

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Obere-Mittelklasse

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

Anzahl der verfügbaren Größen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Anzahl der Tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

Beste Position im Test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

Schlechteste Position im Test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Durchschnittliche Position in Tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Jahr der letzten Prüfung

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Beste Bewertung im Test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Sehr gut

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Sehr gut

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Sehr gut

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Testsieger

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Gut

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

Schlechteste Bewertung im Test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Gut

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Gut

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Gut

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Gut

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Bedingt empfohlen

Nass

(Gesamtbewertung)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Handling - nass

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - quer

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

Aquaplaning - längs

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Nassbremsen

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 62%

Kreisbahn nass

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Nassbremsung nach EU-Label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Trocken

(Gesamtbewertung)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Trockenbremsen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 80%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Handling - trocken

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Trockenleistung

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Schnee

(Gesamtbewertung)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Schneetraktion

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 76%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

Bremsen auf Schnee

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 88%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 80%

Schnee Handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 77%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Kosten

(Gesamtbewertung)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Preis-Wert

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 70%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Rollwiderstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 78%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

Kilometerstand

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Kraftstoffverbrauch nach eu-label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Komfort

(Gesamtbewertung)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Außengeräusch

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 75%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

Innengeräusche

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 33%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Außenlärm nach EU-Label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Eis

(Gesamtbewertung)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%

Eis bremsen

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

5. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Machen

Modell

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 P gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Sommer

Ranglisten

Tests

Marken

Ranglisten

Tests

Marken

Winter

Ranglisten

Tests

Marken

Ranglisten

Tests

Marken

Ganzjahres

Ranglisten

Tests

Marken

Ranglisten

Tests

Marken