57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking WinTech gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Viking
WinTech
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
6
28
4
24
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
20.8
2.3
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
59
67
40
302

Nass

Nass
Viking WinTech
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Nassbremsen
Viking WinTech
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking WinTech
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking WinTech
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Handling - nass
Viking WinTech
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking WinTech
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Nassfahrverhalten
Viking WinTech
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking WinTech
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking WinTech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Schneetraktion
Viking WinTech
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Schnee Handling
Viking WinTech
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Schnee Slalom
Viking WinTech
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking WinTech
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Viking WinTech
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Viking WinTech
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trockenleistung
Viking WinTech
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking WinTech
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Viking WinTech
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Viking WinTech
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Innengeräusche
Viking WinTech
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking WinTech
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kilometerstand
Viking WinTech
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Eis

Eis
Viking WinTech
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
23%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich