57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
5
4
24
3
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
2.8
3.3
2.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
139
40
151
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen