57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Hankook ION FlexClimateObere-Mittelklasse
HankookHankook

ION FlexClimate

9.0
R17 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
10
3
3
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
1.0
6.0
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
27
104
40
34

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich