57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
4
23
28
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
1.0
3.3
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
27
40
176
67

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich