57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
4
5
24
Optimale Position
#11
#5
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
7.3
3.3
2.8
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
59
40
139
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen