57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Budget
GTGT

RADIAL ClimateActive

8.3
R16
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
3
26
5
Optimale Position
#11
#5
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
7.3
3.3
2.2
2.2
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
1
40
66
63

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich