57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
GT RADIAL ClimateActiveBudget
GTGT

RADIAL ClimateActive

8.3
R15 – R22
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
18
4
1
3
Optimale Position
#11
#5
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
7.3
6.1
3.3
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
59
47
40
66
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -WinterreifenBeste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD PlusViking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 SeasonViking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen