57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
3
24
3
Optimale Position
#11
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
3.3
3.7
2.7
1.3
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
40
36
302
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen