56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
26
3
24
Optimale Position
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
3.3
2.2
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
40
66
34
151

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich