57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
13
4
3
28
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
4.3
3.3
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
123
40
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen