56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
1
3
24
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
64
40
151

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich