56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
3
24
33
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
3.3
2.7
4.1
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
40
151
658

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich