57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
6
1
3
5
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
4.7
1.0
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
146
66
36
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen