57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
13
18
1
28
Optimale Position
#11
#6
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
10.9
6.1
1.0
2.3
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
61
47
66
67

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen