57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
13
18
3
16
Optimale Position
#11
#6
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
10.9
6.1
3.7
1.2
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
61
47
36
124

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental SportContact 7
70%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen