56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Multiseason 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
13
14
18
26
Optimale Position
#11
#6
#8
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
10.9
13.4
6.1
2.2
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
61
153
47
66

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Schnee Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Schneetraktion
Viking Fourtech
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Viking Fourtech
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich