56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
1
3
26
Optimale Position
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
34
64
40
66

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich