Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

Falken

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Kinergy 4S2 H750

Anzahl der Tests

5

3

20

Optimale Position

#11

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

17.0

3.7

3.3

4.7

Neuester Test

2021

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

32

34

40

135

Nass

Viking Fourtech

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

80%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

85%

Nassbremsen

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

84%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking Fourtech

55%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

84%

Handling - nass

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

84%

Schnee

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

82%

Schnee Slalom

Viking Fourtech

67%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

75%

Schnee Handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

85%

Schneetraktion

Viking Fourtech

51%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

78%

Bremsen auf Schnee

Viking Fourtech

82%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

85%

Kosten

Viking Fourtech

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

72%

Preis-Wert

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

69%

Rollwiderstand

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

80%

Kilometerstand

Viking Fourtech

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

59%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

88%

Außengeräusch

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

83%

Komfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

74%

Trocken

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

86%

Trockenbremsen

Viking Fourtech

47%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

83%

Handling - trocken

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Kinergy 4S2 H750

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen