57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental SportContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

SportContact 7

10.0
R18 – R23
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
16
4
Optimale Position
#11
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
3.7
1.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2021
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
36
124
40

Nass

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste SchneereifenBeste reifen auf SchneeReifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD PlusViking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3Viking Fourtech vs CST Medallion MD-A1Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31Falken e.Ziex vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.ZiexFalken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXTFalken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich