57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen CST Medallion MD-A1 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
CST
Medallion MD-A1
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
2
18
5
4
3
Optimale Position
#11
#10
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
21.5
6.1
2.2
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2021
2019
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
32
264
47
63
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen