57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen CST Medallion MD-A1 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
CST
Medallion MD-A1
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
2
18
33
4
Optimale Position
#11
#10
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
21.5
6.1
4.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2021
2019
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
264
47
658
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Schnee
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen