57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Toyo Proxes Comfort gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
17
4
18
5
4
Optimale Position
#9
#5
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
9.5
12.0
6.1
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
126
111
47
63
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich