57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Nexen N Fera Primus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Viking FourTech PlusBudget
VikingViking

FourTech Plus

5.6
R14 – R19
Nexen N Fera PrimusBudget
NexenNexen

N Fera Primus

6.5
R15 – R19
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
6
4
3
26
Optimale Position
#9
#10
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.7
12.0
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
60
111
40
66

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Nexen N Fera Primus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Nexen N Fera Primus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Nexen N Fera Primus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Nexen N Fera Primus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Nexen N Fera Primus
49%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich