57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Nexen N Fera Primus gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
6
5
18
4
3
Optimale Position
#9
#10
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.7
2.2
6.1
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
66
63
47
40
36

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Nexen N Fera Primus
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Nexen N Fera Primus
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Nexen N Fera Primus
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Nexen N Fera Primus
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Nexen N Fera Primus
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich