57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
Primacy 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
5
4
18
1
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#3
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.8
12.0
6.1
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
158
111
47
66
63

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich