57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
5
18
4
Optimale Position
#9
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
2.8
6.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
111
139
47
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen