Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

5

4

3

15

3

Optimale Position

#9

#3

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

4.7

9.0

3.7

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

24

111

40

126

225

34

Nass

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Nassbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Handling - nass

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Schnee

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Kosten

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Handling - trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Trockenbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Trocken

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen