57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
4
6
5
5
Optimale Position
#9
#3
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
3.3
4.7
2.8
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
111
40
146
139
63

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich