57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
3
18
4
5
Optimale Position
#9
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
1.3
6.1
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
111
23
47
40
63

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich