57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
SportContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
16
6
4
Optimale Position
#9
#3
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
1.2
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
111
124
146
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental SportContact 7
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen