57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
10
13
18
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
4.3
6.1
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
109
123
47
36
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich