57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
5
4
4
6
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#3
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.8
3.3
12.0
4.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
139
40
111
146
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen