57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
4
3
26
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
12.0
3.3
2.2
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
27
111
40
66
63

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich