57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
4
4
6
3
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#3
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
3.3
12.0
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
27
40
111
146
36

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich