57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
18
5
4
3
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
6.1
2.8
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
27
47
139
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen