57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
18
5
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
6.1
2.8
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
27
47
139
36
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich