Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

FourTech Plus

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Turanza T005

Anzahl der Tests

5

3

1

5

33

Optimale Position

#9

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

1.0

2.2

4.1

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

24

40

64

63

658

Nass

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Handling - nass

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Nassbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Schnee

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Kosten

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Rollwiderstand

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Kilometerstand

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Preis-Wert

Viking FourTech Plus

59%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Außengeräusch

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Trockenbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Handling - trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

FourTech Plus

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Turanza T005

Testprofil

Nass

Schnee

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen