57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
1
6
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
4.7
4.8
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
40
27
146
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen