57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
5
3
1
6
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
2.2
3.7
1.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
63
36
27
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen