57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
3
1
4
9
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
3.3
5.8
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
36
27
40
92

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
69%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
64%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
92%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen