57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
3
6
4
1
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.7
4.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
36
146
40
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen