57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Viking FourTech PlusBudget
VikingViking

FourTech Plus

5.6
R14 – R19
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
3
28
4
1
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.7
2.3
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
36
68
40
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -WinterreifenBeste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFalken e.Ziex vs Falken E.ZiexFalken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXTFalken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianContinentalKumhoVredesteinNexenDunlopGT

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen