57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodride Solmax 1 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodride
Solmax 1
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
13
3
3
5
3
Optimale Position
#9
#8
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
8.0
4.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
46
123
40
34
63
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodride Solmax 1
49%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodride Solmax 1
45%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodride Solmax 1
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodride Solmax 1
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich