57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
18
5
4
5
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.7
6.1
2.2
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
36
47
63
40
139

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich